6 Comments »

I remember when my favorite band of 2007, Quintus, released an EP.  At the time and the ripe, naive age of 20 I remember wondering to myself, “What the heck is an EP?” And soon after, I started noticing tons of other bands releasing EPs.1208901_090729162308_EP_-_Beatles_7

So where did the EP come from, who/what made it popular, and more importantly, what can it do for you–the independent musician?

Before the EP was introduced in the early 1950s, music was mostly released as the 45 rpm vinyl single or the 33 rpm vinyl LP album. Then in 1952, RCA released the “Extended Play” 45 as a competitor to the LP. The EP was still playable by the standard 45 rpm equipment, but used narrower grooves to achieve 7.5 min of playing time per side, and containing about 4-6 tracks total.

Record companies used the EP as a promotional tool to release an artist’s just-cut tracks to generate interest in an upcoming album, and also to package several radio hits onto one vinyl record for a cheaper price.

The EP, although occasionally released in the U.S., never really caught on with consumers here, but it was a big hit with music aficionados in the U.K. and parts of Europe and Asia. In the 1960s popular bands such as the Beatles , the Monkees, and Frank Sinatra all achieved major success with EP releases in the U.K. and Japan.

By the 1980s, singles were being released in formats that allowed for more than 2 tracks (think cassette tape), transforming the EP to be defined by more than just its extended playing time. A release of 4 or more tracks of equal importance became the new standard for the EP, differentiating itself from the 4-track single, which included one main hit and three accompanying songs.

Nowadays, an EP is generally thought of as having up to 36 minutes of music and around four to six tracks, and an album has anywhere from 30-80 minutes of music and about eight to twelve tracks. So who’s releasing EP’s these days? Matisyahu released his “Shattered” EP in October of 2008, and Death Cab for Cutie, Destroyer, and Modest Mouse (The Open Door EP, Bay Of Pigs EP, No One First And You’re Next EP, respectively) all released EPs in 2009.

Most importantly, as an independent artist what are the advantages of releasing an EP (as opposed to an album)? Ultimately you’ll be releasing your new music at a much quicker pace and getting your music to fans faster; since you’ll be recording fewer tracks, you’ll cut down on studio and post-production time, and get your EP out more quickly. And what fans don’t want new music sooner?

Also, professional production costs will be reduced because there are fewer tracks to record. And fewer tracks means a unified sound will be more easily achieved, which we all know is hard to do on an 8-12 track album. Plus, your shorter release will leave fans wanting more, and anticipating your next release!

And one more thing–if you’re producing your EPs for cheaper, releasing them more often, and selling just as many as you would if they were full-length albums, that results in more financial gain in a shorter amount of time.

So when’s your EP release party???

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
6 Responses to “The EP—What’s it Mean to You?”
 

The best thing that an unsigned band can do, especially right now. It really does intrest your fans, and everyone loves a EP release party! Idea – what we’re gonna do, have a free concert with your band headlining with a few other bands, and release your EP then. Nothing works better. Also, for Sonicbids especially, most promoters are looking for 3-4 songs, so pick the ones that get your musicanship the best, and put a lot of good work into recording them. The fewer songs, the better quality of the work. Do this!

Phillip wrote on October 21st, 2009 at 9:24 am

 

[...] VIEW ARTICLE SOURCE [...]

The EP—What’s it Mean to You? wrote on October 23rd, 2009 at 9:16 am

 

We are gonna release an EP in the next couple of months for free download of a concept my bandmate NOBULL is putting together called, “From Zero To Hero” featuring 10 songs of just our music we produced,mixed & mastered with no contributing producers, engineers or artists. Also we’ll have it a shows for free that we’ll be doing in the future, just to give an idea of the different type of Hip Hop that we do. We want people to see that we are trying to bring a different type of Hip Hop that is out today and to show the variety and flexibility we have as artists. An EP is a great way to experiment in what talents you may have other than doing just the things maybe for mainstream (if that’s what you do) sales or promo.

David Bell Jr. (Block Scholars) wrote on October 23rd, 2009 at 11:34 pm

 

Very interesting topic indeed a lot of what you are saying i definitely relate to. I released an Ep as well late last month (27th October)and one of the basic aims is to create momentum for the Lp in front of the audiences, ultimately promoting the initial sound and Lp Album product longer with its extended play. So whoever had just discovered the music now becomes one of those who knew about the next groundbreaking record first, i don’t care how old you are everyone likes saying that.I am selling it, for a minimum price, but as soon as the Lp comes out i will avail it for free downloads especially for places i can not get to now.

MANELIS (mangete/bullzterritorri productions,South Africa) wrote on November 5th, 2009 at 11:59 am

 

I never really quite understood the idea of releasing an EP. Why not tough it out, squeeze out 4 more songs and release a full album? To me, it always felt like a half-assed version of what could have been an album if a little more was put into it. As for giving an EP out for free as a promotional tool before the full album is released, FABULOUS IDEA!! But selling it I think would be wrong. An EP to me is like having sex with someone and then stopping in the middle. I like my music with the full orgasm. :)

Sinem Saniye wrote on November 10th, 2009 at 3:29 am

 

For us it’s not so much a want as a need to make an EP. We would like to record an LP but it takes too long if you don’t have a sugar daddy or record company footing the bill to get it done in one lump. So then, yes, it’s true that recording costs are cheaper, but duplication costs are the same, and people don’t like spending more than $1 a song, so ultimately you are making LESS or the same amount of money.

Think about it: recording costs for EP $2000, duplication $1000 for 1000 CDs, if you’re selling them for $5 (5 songs) you will have to sell 600 to break even.

Steve wrote on November 13th, 2009 at 5:11 pm

Leave a Reply

Comments are moderated to prevent spam and keep the conversation constructive.
Please allow some time for the comment to post