13 Comments »

This article was written by Nick Schenkel at Sweetwater.  Over the next few months, we’re publishing an entire series of articles in the Lounge from Sweetwater. Keep your eyes peeled and check back often!

Over the years, I have played in many bands. I have labored to get band members to show up to practice. I have gone home exhausted after load out with a paltry couple bucks in my pocket. I have dealt with the drama that can erupt between two band members that are at odds with each other. I have been through it all, and I quit.

When I first realized that I no longer wanted to be part of a band, I had tough decisions to make. Was I going to just do the singer/songwriter, guitar and vocal approach? Was I going to do the “band in a box” thing? How was I going to do justice to the songs I had written while keeping the act solo?

There are several ways that an individual can perform with the sound of a full band, but without having the extra personnel. The solution might be as simple as having traditional backing tracks played through the PA system. Another solution might involve using pre-programmed MIDI sequences. Other solutions might be more complex, but might also be more rewarding. Let’s take a look at some of the options.

Traditional Backing Tracks

With the advent of the personal computer and recording software, it’s easy to create backing tracks to play at a live performance. You can load your songs onto a CD or your iPod, and have studio-quality back up for your performance. The problem is that you are locked into a specific arrangement and set list. Also, you either need to have the capability of producing the tracks yourself, or you will need to pay for studio time. This is the “band in a box” approach, and although it can sound great, it often leaves the audience feeling like they just went to a glorified karaoke performance.

Pre-programmed Sequences

With a MIDI sequencing sound module and some kind of controller, you can have high-quality sound and a certain amount of flexibility. By preprogramming different sequences for each part of a song, you can opt to stay with a particular passage longer (for example, to play a little longer on the solo), or edit out a passage altogether (skip the third verse). This allows the performer the ability to react to the audience, and adjust the performance to suit the mood.

Loop-based Performance

Thanks to advances in technology, we now have access to loop pedals that can record sound-on-sound for anywhere from 10 seconds to 10 hours. With these powerhouse loopers, a performer can build an entire arrangement in front of an audience. This can lead to a very engaging and dramatic show that will have people talking for days afterward.

To get a general idea of the process, check out a live video of KT Tunstall performing “Black Horse and the Cherry Tree” solo sometime. (There are several available on YouTube.) KT uses an Akai E2 Head Rush pedal to do the looping for her. By using the percussive elements of her guitar, a tambourine, and handclaps, along with her voice, she builds a lush arrangement in a matter of seconds.

If you take this general model a little further, you can see how easy it can become to take a solo performance in a new and exciting direction. Perhaps one might choose to incorporate some simple drum loops from an external source, and (while bringing in the drum loops) use an octave pedal to lay in a bass line. You could take a microphone around the room, and have the audience provide rhythmic elements by clapping or hitting glasses with their spoons. The possibilities are endless.

The end result is a memorable performance that avoids the “canned” feel of pre-recorded/programmed backing track. The audience can also be engaged in a creative and constructive way, adding to the uniqueness of each show. This elevates the solo performance above its usual clichés, making it a fresh and involving experience.

The three options above are by no means a comprehensive list. Certainly, one can consider a number of options using a computer with recording software, or a keyboard workstation with recording options, as ways to expand the possibilities available to you as a solo performer and perhaps lead you in a new direction.

The main point is that there are many ways to avoid being the singer/songwriter in the corner of the coffeehouse strumming your guitar to an uninterested audience. Similarly, one does not necessarily need to work with a band in order to present a full-bodied arrangement in a live environment. With the right technology and a little imagination, you can take your solo act into uncharted territories and pick up new fans along the way.

Nick From Sweetwater

Nick Schenkel is a guitarist and sound designer. He has degrees in music production and engineering, and has spent the last fifteen years working in both live sound and recording studios. Nick currently works at Sweetwater as a Sales Engineer, and can be reached at (800) 222-4700 ext. 1399 or nick_schenkel@sweetwater.com.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
13 Responses to “Going Solo”
 

You never know when a flash of Wisdom is going to appear, and knock on your doors. I have a Digitech GNX4 studio system; and I need to start learning how to use it…I have been longing for a back-up band, and missing those days past; for quite a while.Reading this is just the shot in the arm, that I needed to “get the lead out, and start doing it. I really miss the back-up vocals, and the Guitar rhythm/dbl leads,this will fill out the songs,as they were intended to be…I also noticed that; the female artist, got quite a responsive applause, from the audience;and they did notice her adding the tracks…Thank You, for the boost…Merlin, the Mystic. soloist guitar/singer.

Merlin,the Mystic wrote on November 8th, 2008 at 12:55 pm

 

very impressive – K.T. Tunstall looks like a guitar goddess with that E2 pedal. What a great display of how to use a wonderful tool for a soloist. It is inspiration to creative possibilities…

Thanks!

Colleen :)

Colleen C. Clark wrote on November 12th, 2008 at 9:05 pm

 

Great advice. When I play, it’s primarily just me and a guitar, so I use a Boss Loop Station (RC20) pedal, simply because it adds some meat to my solo performances.

But I always make sure that I use it wisely. If an artist builds a backing track with the loop pedal for every song in a show, it’ll be cool for the first little while but then it gets old quickly. When it’s not overused, however, it is very effective in engaging the audience. I think loop pedals are most effective when they are another tool in your toolbox and not the thing that your performance is built on.

Anyway, if you really want to see a Loop Pedal in action, check out Phil Keaggy here (What he does at 5:57 is especially cool): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nV3bLZLpqTQ

danbursey wrote on November 14th, 2008 at 9:57 am

 

I’m glad to see such a response to the article. My hope was to get more people thinking about different approaches to solo performances, and it looks like that goal has been achieved. I started working with loops on an RC-20XL, but have since moved up to the RC-50. While I agree that the loop pedal needs to be used sparingly, it is a great way to get the creative juices going. There are other innovative ways to build a multi-instrument approach into a solo performance. The AdrennaLinn III pedal has a built-in drum machine that I find very useful. Both the AdrennaLinn and the RC-50 are able to synch via MIDI, which allows my loops to be quantized perfectly every time. These tools are usefully not only in the realm of performance, but can be of great benefit during the songwriting process itself.

Nick Schenkel wrote on November 15th, 2008 at 1:21 pm

 

While I have seen several acts that used this technology very well I find that the same thing happened each time with regards to the audience. In each case the audience became more interested in the procedure and the technology used and seemed to ignore or forget what the song was about. I remember one artist that was using a looper to pevide backing to a song that she considered to have a very important message lyricly and out of curiousity after the performance I asked several in the audience what they thought of that particular song and no one could tell me what it was about, but, they all enjoyed watching her use the looper.

David Thompson wrote on November 17th, 2008 at 12:26 am

 

Or you can just do it the old-fashioned way of just voice, guitar and harmonica.

Bob Cushing wrote on November 17th, 2008 at 3:34 pm

 

This is a great article Nick.

I too am really kinda frustrated with trying to get everything and everyone on the same page, and am working towards going solo.

I am experiencing the same questions you were asking yourself, too. I love acoustic guitar music and the whole singer songwriter thing, but I am a much better songwriter and performer than a singer.

I have signed up for some music production classes using Ableton Live 7 and am really excited about the possibilities to come.

That’s a great idea to get your audience involved with the process. It really would add a memorable experience to those involved and watching.

Thanks for the article!

Jeff F wrote on November 17th, 2008 at 7:33 pm

 

I too quit, way back in the late 80’s for many of these same reasons. You struggle for 30 yrs and finally land a tour in Europe as well as America,,, and the leader of the band walks out from the pressure… Back then this stuff wasn’t available. Or I might have just gone there. Being almost 60 now puts me out of the picture, although I really miss it. Now I have a child, 16, Tori Allen, that is solo and when her friends want to start a band, I get real nervous. She has mentioned this, that she wants to do this loop thing. She plays 5 instruments and this will work for her! Thanks for the heads-up!

Dudley P Allen wrote on November 18th, 2008 at 7:07 pm

 

I perform solo – playing guitar instrumentals along with backing tracks, which I launch from my laptop using MIDI foot pedalboard. Ableton Live software is the one you need – forget about 90’s era hardware loop-stations. I can turn on/off VST effect or automation can do this for me! Check my web http://www.olmerk.com and watch video clips of me perfoming live.

Oleg Merkuriev wrote on November 27th, 2008 at 7:33 am

 

Going solo has it’s benefits and liabilities.

Gear can solve some problems certainly, however, it can’t solve the problem of content. Other musicians can bring talent, inspiration, etc… but not without management will the result be an improvement. There is no quick fix, no magic box. Talent, if you posess it, will be evident if you don’t sabotage it’s presentation. Learn to play, learn to write, perform, and so on. Whatever you lack, try to address those concerns. Only then does technology or a synergy with others work.

Daniel Warren wrote on December 1st, 2008 at 4:51 pm

 

I know exactly what you mean and how you feel. And this is coming from an “OL Skool” musician that put up a fight against sequencing, but I have seen the light and approach in what I thought was a totally different way until reading your article. I have my sequences in parts for flexibility and everything is fine but I live in fear at times. I am not all that techical and I’m a former drummer (which really kept me out the tech loop). Now I have to know about PA’s….keyboards….mikes etc. So far so good but I just played with a band (with my sequences) recently taping a tv show and I have to say…..something sparked after being happy solo for 4 years. Now I’m torn between the two.
Also I need some help (technically) with my Yamaha Motif ES6. please contact me at PhunkNC@yahoo.com.
For a taste of my show…..go to http://www.bandmix.com/phunkplayah
Everything is live….no overdubs…..even the background vocals……live!!!!
Peace

"PHUNKPLAYAH" wrote on December 2nd, 2008 at 9:42 pm

 

I think your article was great. I too have found being in bands a love hate relationship. I love the music and I love the musicians. I hate the egos clashing, and the desire to relive other musicians lives by performing only covers just for the sake of the ability to work. I don’t understand this mentality, how can you be unique playing someone elses hits who is dead or living, but not attempting to make your own. Who wants to be that guy gal or group that sounds like so and so. I know that we have a limited time on this earth to document our selves. So we should be about the business of striving to be original in our day and time! Let the world enjoy our music when we are gone instead of being nameless and faceless! I use band members as needed when there is a budget and work this works much better for me.

Rahshad wrote on March 16th, 2009 at 7:47 am

 

Wow, I can relate totally! I can afford to hire studio musicians, but for live performances it’s a little rough. If I had the money it would be a great thing to have a live band for all performances. I hate solo acoustic! I want to ROCK! Anyway, I feel better about performing with no vox cds (of my music), than with musicians that play your songs half ass because they’re not being paid.

Thanks for this subject!

John

John Daly wrote on May 16th, 2009 at 2:16 pm

Leave a Reply

Comments are moderated to prevent spam and keep the conversation constructive.
Please allow some time for the comment to post